Friday, December 21, 2007

You're the only one at your party

There's an interesting phenomenon about movie-making that the general public is probably not aware of. The hand-wringing and heartache felt by the producers, directors, actors and other people involved in their film when no one sees their work. This is especially true for independents because of how hard it is to get distribution and get a movie out into the world.

Lets say that someone has made a short-film and they have a scheduled a screening at a local theater for their friends and family to see their latest masterpiece. The friends and family (unless they are immediate friends/family) are likely to perceive the whole affair as just going to see this "little" movie and have no concept of how many hours (likely several hundred hours or more for a short film) were put into the few minutes they are going to watch. Because of their lack of understanding of what goes into any movie, the significance of the screening for them is likely lost amongst their thoughts about what they're doing before or after they sit in their seat.

Too many times I've been a bystander viewing with horror a filmmaker who holds a public screening (sometimes where people actually have to [gasp] pay for their ticket) only to have a couple people show up to see their film. What went wrong?! Was the movie just not any good? That can't be the problem since no one has seen it yet, right? Most filmmakers spend so much of their time, energy, and thoughts on the actual making of the movie that they forget there's an even harder effort in front of them to market the movie.

The creme de la creme of festivals for most filmmakers in the US is Sundance. It opens next month in Park City, UT and I'm betting there's going to be more than one director or producer who's ready to cry when its over. Movies face overwhelming odds to even get into Sundance and there's always someone who assumes their entry guarantees them a capacity crowd to see their movie. Not only is this grossly naive, but the costs to attend festivals for the filmmakers is usually pretty high without them spending any money to market their movie at the festival. They usually don't get multiple shots at "getting it right" within their limited windows at each festival.

How or why would anyone want to attend a screening of their movie at a festival and be confronted with the horror of an empty theater? It takes significant effort to "get the word out" for any movie - whether at a festival, at a single engagement at an indie theater or a DVD party at some local venue. A very wise and experienced producer friend of mine once said to me, "no one is going to care about your movie more than you, and no one should be working harder to get people to see it than you."

I'm sad to say that I've recently seen a case in point of this very phenomenon for a director whom I would have thought would be treated with more respect by an actual distributor: Tom DiCillo. You may not recognize his name right away, but he wrote and directed one of my all-time favorite movies, "Living in Oblivion". His most recent film "Delirious" was distributed by Peace Arch Entertainment. I don't know exactly what went wrong here - his film premiered at Sundance 2007, garnered spectacular reviews, and seemed to be loved by most who saw it. It opened in New York and Los Angeles followed by short runs in several other cities (including Portland at Cinema 21), but only managed to gross a paltry $200,000. The whole distribution process and Tom's frustration with how it played out is documented on his blog at http://www.tomdicillo.com/blog. He was so frustrated that he e-mailed Roger Ebert to ask him his opinion of what went wrong. Ebert's kindly response was well thought out and details many things filmmakers should think about for their films.

In closing, the next time you're invited to attend a screening of someone's film, remember that it likely contains a piece of their heart and soul. Whether you decide to blow them off or make an appearance is obviously up to you. I would ask you though... for an event that might be as sentimentally important as a wedding, can you really afford to blow that off?!

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hey Steve,
I thoroughly enjoyed your post. It is clear, objective and well-reasoned. The only problem, and it is a huge one, is that when it comes down to it I don't think people care one way or another about what went into a film. And maybe they're not wrong. Maybe they should just be able to enjoy, or not enjoy, based solely on what appears on their movie screens or TV sets. Let's face it, not every sob-story struggle results in a good film. I might include one or two of mine in this.
Delirious though is another story entirely. I am more proud of this film than anything I've ever done. I'm not referring only to my work; the contributions from everyone who worked on it from cast to crew were spectacular. Believe me that ratio of willingness and talent does not always happen.
The tragedy to me was seeing something with such potential squandered with such indifference and incompetence. But, hey--I got it made. That is a victory. And I'm proud to put my name on it. That is another victory.
I do believe, however, that your clarity about the business aspect of filmmaking is sharp and necessary. If anything it might help audiences take a chance to go see smaller films without huge advertising budgets. That is always a huge risk for audiences; deciding what to invest their time and emotion in.
And for that I thank you. I sincerely appreciate your support and the nods to the other areas of info about Delirious. I will be adding your site to the blogroll.
My only request(and please forgive me for it) is it possible to find another photo? The one you posted looks like no incarnation of myself I've ever seen. There are some nice stills from Delirious on www.deliriousthemovie you can download for free. Take your pick.
Good luck to you.
Let me know if there is anything I can help you with as you continue your venture forward into this delightfully thorny thicket.
best,
Tom

Steve said...

Tom,

Thanks for taking the time to read and (then even more) comment on my little blog post.

I do agree that wishing people to consider the effort put into a film is a little naive, but as a whole I think it does have an impact. Take hand-made goods for instance. People routinely pay more (which I take to mean appreciate them more) for something that is hand-made than they would for something off an assembly line in China. Sadly there are a lot of Walmart shoppers though.

The disconnect occurs when the story, production value, and even low-level star power in an independent film allows them to be marketed AS a mainstream Hollywood film. Suddenly, the little indie that could is just like any other movie hitting the multiplex that week.

Everyone feels qualified to voice their criticism of any movie, and maybe rightfully so. It is after all THEIR time they invest in watching each film, so they have their own vested interest. Now if we could only figure out a way to turn that interest into motivation for them to tell their friends when they truly enjoy a movie.